Gary Hume is a contemporary artist who graduated from Goldsmiths and became one of the original members of the YBA (Young British Artists) alongside others such as Tracy Emin, Damien Hirst and Fiona Rae. Hume’s usual medium is household gloss paint on a support of mdf and aluminium, he uses these materials to create a highly reflective surface to his work which allows you to see yourself and your surroundings staring back at you from the painting. Whilst his paints many different subjects from still life to figure work to animals, his style remains prominent in everything he does. He uses large, flat areas of paint on very large supports which give a highly graphical, almost pop art like effect. This modernist, almost abstract art is not something that I would usually be drawn to however I have unexpectedly really enjoyed looking at his work for this research point and it is for the exact purpose of this part of the course, his use of negative space. I have to question though whether indeed much of his work uses negative space, I would suggest that perhaps there is no negative space but that negative space has become positive space and vice versa or perhaps it is all just positive space. It was this thought process that really got me intrigued and looking more and more of his work. A painting that I particularly like is Vicious 2010 (fig 24). This is a good example of his confusing use of both positive and negative space. We can see that, what would traditionally be considered the negative space has been given interest with leaves and flowers, an elaborate wallpaper or background. Where we would imagine the detailing would be (within the figure) there is in fact nothing but empty space. It is interesting that you don’t need the detail to see what we are looking at. It is clearly a man, well built with broad, muscular shoulders and clenched fists. We can even almost make out the man’s hair style. There is a lot of contrasting ideas in here, the strength of the main character compared to the fragility of the floral background and the highly saturated colours on a black backdrop contrasted against the plain brown of the figure. Given that I know Hume likes to create highly reflective surfaces to his art, I wonder if he wants you to place yourself inside the blank figure?
Another painting that caught my attention was Blackbird 1998 (fig 25). In this case, he has clearly defined what should be perceived as negative space and brought this into the main subject. He uses his usual technique, using blocks of flat colour to create the foliage and blackbird, although there does appear to be some areas of thinner paint towards the bird’s head. The negative space around these images are painted in a very light colour (perhaps even white) and is brought into focus as the branch and feet of the bird before re-joining the negative space on the other side. The colours in this painting are made to contrast, the white branches against the black foliage and the dark blue bird against the orange and yellow of its beak and eye. This seems to result in a bold flavour to the painting and whilst I cannot see the reflective nature, I can imagine that this would add an extra dimension to the strength. I also find it interesting how your eye creates the outline, where there is none, of the branches where it blends back into the background. Another observation of mine is that the contours of the foliage look laboured over. When you first look, they appear to be random but upon closer inspection there is a stiffness too them. I find it difficult to imagine there was any flow in its painting and whilst it is quite a simple, almost graphic image, it looks like there has been considerable thought and a large amount scrutinising to achieve the finished product.
Whilst researching negative space in art, I came across a young artist by the name of Tang Yau Hoong. He is a Malaysian artist, illustrator and graphic designer who uses watercolour, calligraphy pens, paint markers, tablets and graphical imaging software. He has a great use of negative space, incorporating it into the main subject to create optical illusions and clever, quirky works. Some are just fun, such as Songbird (fig26), some are more thought provoking, for example, Red (fig 27), others make your eyes go funny such as Sky Aperture (fig 28), some are a mixture of all three. They are all very clever and a lot of thought and preparation must have gone into them to create the weird and/or wonderful combination of subjects. This artist clearly has a love of combining subjects, especially if ironic, into a seamless drawing that can be seen in more than one way.
Still life is the depiction of inanimate objects such as fruit, dead animals (especially game), flowers. scientific instruments etc. Although there is evidence of still life as far back as Ancient Egypt and the Greek Empire, it is a genre that started becoming popular in the early 1600’s. At this point it was seen as a lowly art form, the only truly worthy art was still of a religious nature or portraiture. Having said this, it was commercially viable and the middle classes would hang exuberant still lifes of banquets and exotic fruit or flowers as a sign of wealth and opulence. As still life was developing, artists such as Pieter Aertsen (1508 – 1575) would create paintings where still life would take prominence leaving the religious aspect to fade into the background somewhat, this can clearly be seen in A Meat Stall with the Holy Family Giving Alms – 1551 (fig 13). Michelangelo Merisi Da Caravaggio (1571 – 1610) also adopted this style and a good example of this would be Bacchus – 1596 (fig 14) or Boy With A Basket Of Fruit 1593 (fig 15) where it is said that the fruit is so realistically rendered, scientific horticulturalists have been able determine where each individual piece of fruit was cultivated. It appears that Caravaggio’s Basket of Fruit 1596 (fig 16) is seen as one of the first paintings to feature a still life as the sole subject. This painting has had much discussion on the meaning behind it, with the realistically rendered depiction of slowly deteriorating fruit, imperfect apples and wilting foliage. The main opinion being that this is a painting depicting the fragility of life.
It was mainly the Flemish masters of the 17th century that made the still life genre popular. Artist such as Willem Kalf (1619 – 1693), Willem Heda (1593/4 – 1680/2) and Abraham Van Beyeren (1620 – 1690) specialised in works to show great banquets depicting large fruit platters, lobsters, game and ostentatious tableware. Others such as Pieter Claesz (1597 – 1661) and Evert Collier (1640 – 1707) were known to specialise particularly in a sub-genre of still life known as Vanitas a particularly morbid form of still life depicting skulls, candles, hourglasses and other objects to symbolise the inevitability of death. Flowers, especially of an exotic nature was another whole sub-genre of still life and was made popular by the likes of Jan Davidsz de Heem (1608 – 1684) and Ambrosius Bosschaert ( 1573 – 1621). These styles of painting remianed popular throughout the 18th century and was by now popular throughout Europe, all the while being developed, with careful observation and highly detailed works remaining the fashion.
It was in the 19th century, with the rise of the impressionism, that still life had a new lease of life. Artists such as Vincent Van Gogh (1853 – 1890) , Claude Monet (1840 – 1926), Paul Cezanne (1839 – 1906) and Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841 – 1919). It was around this time that many artist started concentrated less on detail and more on colour, light and form. Van Gogh’s Sunflowers 1888 (fig 17) is still one of the most famous still lifes of all time and whilst Monet is more well known for his impressionist landscapes we can see in Still-Life with Apples and Grapes 1880 (fig 18) that he was more than versed in the genre of still life. Cezanne’s Still Life with Cherub 1895 (fig 19), is a good example of how colour and light can be used to replace fine detail, without losing feeling.
The 20th century brought with it the rise of cubism, brought forward by Georges Braque (1882 – 1963) and Pablo Picasso (1881 – 1973). Cubism uses geometric shapes and planes often from different perspectives and vantage points, emphasising the two dimensional canvas whilst viewing three dimensions simultaneously, it rejects the traditional way seeing. It is one of the most influential movements the art world has seen and opened the path to more abstract art. Examples of cubism can be seen in Georges Braque’ s Violin and Candlestick 1910 (fig 20) and in Pablo Picasso’s Still Life With Chair Caning 1912 (fig 21).
The 21st century, a time of technological revolution, is an open minded society full of possibilities. With the invention of digital cameras and computer generated imaging, a world of new media has been opened up to us. Photography is now deemed as a serious art form and has allowed us to not only use photographs as art in themselves but also for the artist using traditional media to slow the world down to a single frame, a singular point in time that can be studied and scrutinised at our leisure. Time After Time: Blow Up No3, 2007 by Ori Gersht (1967 – present) (fig 22) is an example, it depicts a reproduction bouquet of that painted by Henri Fantin-Latour (1836 – 1904) in the 19th century. He has used a shutter speed of 1/6000 sec to capture the bouquet being exploded. Roy Hodrien (1957 – present) has clearly been influence by the masters of old and uses oil paint in thin translucent layers to create a very traditional looking still life, such as Silver teapot with Lemons (fig 23). I like the look of these paintings and in them you can see the vibrancy of colour that was probably akin to what the 17th century paintings may have originally looked like.
It seems as though still life is as relevant today as it has been over the past few centuries and is certainly no longer perceived as a lowly form of art. Whether creating some new or appropriating the previous fathers of still life, people will always find symbolism in objects. Learning to paint inanimate objects, using careful observation of colour, light, form and mass is still applicable today as not only a good place to start from but also a staple in the diet of any artist. It can always be developed upon or rejected for other subjects but should never be dismissed as unworthy.
The Royal Academy of Arts website describes this exhibition thus:
“The art of 1930s America tells the story of a nation in flux. Artists responded to rapid social change and economic anxiety with some of the 20th century’s most powerful art – brought together now in this once-in-a-generation show.”
The 1930s was of course the time of severe recession in America. We know that many people lost their livelihoods overnight, committing suicide rather than face the reality. The Great War was now over but the repercussions can still be felt but there is an impending doom as another is on the horizon. There is also still a problem with racism during this period, Martin Luther King Jr has not yet taken the stage and whilst slavery had been abolished for over 65 years, black people are still seen as second class citizens for the most part. Whilst this is an ominous time, it also gives the artist many things to consider and much material for creating thought provoking, emotionally challenging work. It was with this in mind that I entered the exhibition, wondering how this would be illustrated, if at all.
I am not going to give my evaluation on all the pieces that I saw, there are far too many for this relatively short report, but I will share the work that spoke to me the most and try to explain what drew me to them and why.
New York – Paris No 3 by Stuart Davis (fig 4).
Stuart Davis (1892 – 1964) was an influential American modernist artist. He spent most of his time in New York but in 1928 he lived for a year in Paris, it is this sabbatical that is clearly the influence behind this series of work.
This painting reminds me a little of my fridge door which is adorned with magnets from the places I’ve visited, Davis uses large flat areas of colour to create a stencilled look. Nothing quite connects or is placed in any context but are rather snippets or landmarks that have grabbed his attention along the way. You can imagine Davis drawing these images in his sketchbooks and then bringing them together in this “slideshow” of images.
Whilst the style is the same throughout you can see many variations within each image, for example, the trees in the top left are curved and quite abstract, he uses 3 variations of the same colour to give a sense of distance but overall it is quite drab. Next to this however, to the far left, we have a very rigid image of a signpost standing tall, using bright red to give it some colour and make it stand out against the plain background. This is then echoed in the centre of the painting with the petrol pump which is so prominent, you almost overlook the car behind or the countryside backdrop. The image in the top centre shows a selection of furniture piled up and I wonder whether this has been pre-arranged in order to convey a thought, perhaps disarray or clutter, or whether this was just some old furniture piled up somewhere in a shop or back alley.
I think that overall this is a very personal piece a selection of subjects particular to the artist. I feel that I need a narrative alongside it to fully appreciate it, an explanation from the artist explaining where he was when he saw each piece and what it represents.
Street Life, Harlem 1939 by William H Johnson (fig 5)
William H Johnson (1901 – 1970) was an African American artist born in South Carolina. Johnson moved into Harlem, New York in 1918 at the age of 17 and began to study at The National Academy of Art until 1928 when he would move to France. Johnson did not return to Harlem for 10 years and during this time he lived in France, Denmark and North Africa and in this time you can see a huge change in his work. It seems to have taken him until this point to truly find his identity and if you look at his work throughout his life up until he returns to Harlem, you will see that he has experimented with a number of styles from a more classical approach to a Van Gogh style to some with a more abstract and simplified take. I think that once Street Life, Harlem has been completed in 1939, he has begun to settle on the artist he wants to be, a voice that he has taken almost 40 years to find.
The piece itself upon first inspection, I took to be a black couple wearing smart clothes, their “Sunday best” perhaps on their way to the local church. However when I looked closer I noticed the moon in the top left hand corner so clearly this is meant to be an evening scene and along with the blues and violets in the buildings add to the appearance of an evening at twilight. I think this changes my whole perception and now I feel like this painting is of a trendy, urban, black couple ready for a night on the town. I think perhaps that Johnson being a black artist wanted to bring everyday life of the African American into public view whilst at the same time creating something that the black community could respond to.
Johnson has used blocks of flat colour without any shading and making it almost cartoon like. It is appropriate then that the painting be full of colour which gives a vibrancy to it and whilst (other than the main characters) there are no other people in the scene there is a sense of movement making the empty street feel busy and I would suggest that this is down to the inaccuracy or looseness of the contour lines. I am rather perplexed at the expression on the faces, I would have thought that the message was to be an uplifting one of changing times, the characters are well dressed ready to hit the streets and yet they appear unhappy. Perhaps Johnson was painting them in repose but the small eyes and down-turned mouths suggest otherwise.
American Landscape 1930 by Charles Sheeler (fig 6)
Charles Sheeler (1883 – 1965) born in Philadelphia, was a modernist artist who not only used traditional media to create his art but also photography and filmography which at the time, was highly controversial in the art world. Whilst he produced many of his paintings from photos he had taken, he didn’t simply produce a copy but rather was fascinated by the way different mediums effected the impression of the scene. He had very mathematical or scientific approach to creating his work and buildings feature heavily amongst much of it.
When I first saw American Landscape I felt a stillness to it. There appears to be very little going on and there are no people present except for a very small stick figure like character towards the centre. There is a calm sky and still water. Given that this painting is dated 1930, presumably within a year of the Wall Street Crash and in the midst of a depression, I assumed that this was to signify work has stopped, I thought that the singular character was perhaps an industrialist or ex employee walking alone around the now empty site. I have since done some research and am now aware that the truth is to the contrary. This painting is taken from a series of photographs that Sheeler took of the Ford Motor Company in 1927 which was commissioned to give an impression of the innovation of a new, industrial America that should be embraced. I’m still not sure I can see this but perhaps that is because I have been born into an age where huge plants are no longer a modern marvel to behold.
The title American Landscape is extremely apt for this painting, although this is clearly not a landscape in the traditional sense, surely that is the point. The smoke from the chimney melts into the sky to form part of the clouds, the buildings form a mountainous backdrop and the mounds of grit look like rolling hills, we also see what appears to be a man made body of water reflecting wonderfully all of the above to complete a version of what would be considered a traditional landscape.
New York Movie 1939 by Edward Hopper and Gas 1940 by Edward Hopper
Edward Hopper (1882 -1967) born in New York, was an influential realist artist throughout the 20th century. He was fortunate enough to come from a middle class family that encouraged Hopper in his art though steered him towards the more commercial form being illustration. Whilst Hopper was successful in this field, it clearly wasn’t where his passion lay and after just one year of studying at the Correspondence School of Illustrating he shifted towards studying fine art at the New York School of Art. It was here that Hopper studied under Robert Henri who encouraged his students to paint the world in which they lived using a very realistic approach. This must be where Hopper excelled the most given that his most well known works are of just this, although there does seem to be a continuing theme of isolation and loneliness running through his work which can clearly be seen in both New York Movie 1939 and Gas 1940.
New York Movie 1939 (fig 7)
My first thought of this was how wonderful the lighting was in this painting. The lone figure (which I’m told by the tutor by the visit) is actually Josephine, Hopper’s wife. She stands alone looking contemplative lit dramatically from the right by the wall light. There is a clear divide between her and the theatre this is shown by a large dark pillar this has been further exaggerated by being lit from the opposite side, reflecting all the light away from her on that side and towards the rest of the theatre. The theatre is self looks empty with only one gentleman clearly seen and another perhaps in the shadow. Following the theme of isolation again you can see that whilst the focus is clearly on the usher, she only takes up around a quarter of the canvas, the theatre (whilst beautifully painted) however has very little impact and yet takes up the majority.
Gas 1940 Fig (8)
Whilst this painting has an altogether different subject the mood of it is very similar. Again we have an eerie feeling of isolation, loneliness and perhaps even resignation. It also is wonderfully lit, mainly from The right hand side. The backdrop is reasonably traditional a calm sky and a tree lined road leading somewhere but then we have bright red petrol pump popping out from the green backdrop with a singular man who given the lack of car clearly works here. The petrol station itself seems extremely well kept, a neatly stacked row of cans stands next to the pumps and everything is extremely clean. The man is also well dressed for a petrol station attendant and is diligently keeping himself busy in his isolation. The rendering in the man himself is particularly impressive to me, especially for the size, each fold in his shirt can be seen as can the texture in his trousers.
Pat Whalen 1935 by Alice Neel (fig 9)
Alice Neel (1900 – 1984) is a female Artist born just outside of Philadelphia. Although she painted landscape and still life, she is most well known for her portraiture. Although Neel painted many of her friends, family and loved ones, many of her portraits would have a political or social influence behind them and Pat Whalen being a communist activist and union leader is actually a very good example of this. She had many traumatic episodes throughout her early life, her brother died whilst she was still very young. Later her daughter died before her 1st birthday and later her Husband would emigrate back to his homeland with her child. This led to a failed suicide attempt in 1930 which in turn ended her in a sanatorium for a year until she was deemed stable. This period of her life would no doubt have dramatically influenced her art. After her Husband left her and before she was committed, Neel took to drawing many female nudes which are well known for their brutal honesty. She felt that by going against the traditional way of depicting women as wall flowers to be gazed at, she was empowering women, showing the world truly what the female body and femininity is. I think she clearly enjoyed pushing the boundaries of conventional art. In terms of the depression Neel worked for the WDA (Work Progress Administration) and during this period would paint mostly street scenes as well as extreme left wing leaders and thinkers, I can only assume this was for propaganda purposes. It was during this time that Alice Nell painted Pat Whalen.
You don’t need to look too hard to see what this piece is about, especially knowing that Pat Whalen was a well-known communist activist and union leader. He is sitting in a grey room with a plain blue shirt and crumpled jacket. Beneath his clenched fists is a copy of a newspaper titled “Daily Worker” the headline being “STEEL, COAL STRIKES SET………” (you can’t read the end of the sentence), it is dated Monday June 16, 1935 I assume the very date it was painted. This is clearly a message to the impoverished, hard-working man. The man’s eyes are red with tiredness and yet his hands are clenched to show resoluteness and perhaps frustration. The hands are outlined thickly, much more so than the rest of the painting and they are higher in saturation too, I would suggest that this is to draw your attention to them they almost make a focal point within the painting. The subject has an expression of weariness about him, the aforementioned eyes have a redness to them with puffy bags beneath, his forehead appears creased, yet his mouth shows something different, the hint of a smile maybe or perhaps this is all he could muster. Neel seems to have used broad, expressive strokes, especially on the background and shadows, the paint looks quite thin and to have been built up in layers. I also notice that whilst the face is quite realistic the hands and sleeves seem a lot more cartoon like.
Grant Wood (1891 – 1942)
Grant Wood was a member of the regionalist movement that took place throughout America during the 1930’s. Wood, born on a farm in Iowa, felt modernist art to be elitist and wanted to create something that represented the hard working, suburban families. It was in 1928 during a trip to Munich that Wood was inspired by the realism of 15th and 16th century Flemish masters. He decided to try and take a far more realistic approach to his work than he had in the past. It was in 1930 that Wood exhibited American Gothic – one of America’s most iconic paintings – and this catapulted him and the movement of Regionalism into the limelight. This was the start of his work portraying rural, Midwestern people and landscapes, looking to his childhood for inspiration. Wood was keen to spread the word of Regionalism and used his fame to create many opportunities for this. In 1932 Wood co-founded the Stone City Colony and Art School, 2 years later in 1934, he took a position in the Art Department at the University of Iowa and in the same year was named director of the Public Works of Art in Iowa, he was also featured in Time Magazine, he used these positions as a catalyst to spread his nationalistic message.
American Gothic 1930 (fig 10)
American Gothic depicts a man and woman – that could be Husband and Wife or Perhaps Father and Daughter – standing in front of a suburban style, weather boarded house with a steeply pitched roof and long gothic window. The man stares directly at the viewer whilst the woman is looking to the right of the painting, though not directly at her husband (or father). They are dressed very traditionally in working class clothes which whilst plain are well presented, the woman’s clothes have a very similar style to the curtains in the window. The man looks strong, resolute and proud, the woman on the other hand is not quite as confident, looking perhaps a little worried though standing by her Husband in unity. There is great attention to detail in this painting down to the buttons on the man’s shirt ro the plants on the porch. The pattern on the woman’s dress, whilst plain, is extremely uniform as is the curtain in the window. It looks to me that Wood has a very tight style, his brush marks appear extremely well considered and I would think this takes many hours of observation and thought as well as the painting itself. Other than the figures themselves, we have lots of vertical lines in this piece, the boarding on the house, windows mirrored by the pitch fork and even the stripes in the man’s shirt. This gives a calm yet structured feeling to the painting which I think is probably the overriding theme, especially given the times.
Daughters of Revolution 1932 (fig 11)
This painting the depicts three middle-aged women stood in front of the painting George Washington crossing the Delaware River by Emanuel Leutze. There is an air of reverence about these women although they clearly are not particularly wealthy, dressed in quite plain clothing with the little adornments. The woman in the centre holds a China teacup in a very prim and proper fashion with small finger pointing outwards, which signifies to me a I want of betterment. They have strong expressions of resoluteness and authority, the matriarchs of the community. What is a distinct separation between the two women on the left and the third on the right, framing the painting hanging on the wall in the centre, and reproduction of the aforementioned George Washington crossing the Delaware river. This is clearly meant to be a focal point in this painting. Set during the American Revolutionary War in the late 1700s, George Washington crossing the Delaware river the commemorate the first surprise attack buy Washington’s forces on the hessian army. Therefore Daughters of Revolution to me is an extremely nationalistic painting, showing pride in one’s Country.
Although Wood in this painting has again paid attention to fine detail which we can see in the picture frame, the patterning on the teacup and the excellent reproduction of the painting in the background comma this piece has a slightly different feel to it. The figures seem to have a lot more of an illustrative effect, the necks seem out of proportion and the chins seem quite short. We can still see that’s every mark has been carefully considered and looking at the patterning in the woman’s dress to the left or the Lace collar of the woman on the right it almost appears as they have been stencilled on due to the accuracy and uniformity of the patterning. Again it seems like Wood has used layers of thin paint giving the piece a smooth, refined finish.
Death on the Ridge Road 1935. (fig 12)
This painting is of impending doom. Set in a picturesque landscape of rolling hills and lush green grass with a quaint, winding road running through the centre. However there is a collision on the horizon. A bright red truck is hurtling over the hill tyres off the floor whilst in the other direction a town car driving across both lanes, neither will be able to see the other until it is too late, a third is sat slightly behind. We can see what inevitably will happen next. The road on either side is lined with barbed wire fencing preventing any means of escapes for the vehicles. There is a menace to this painting too, a storm is looming, with clear sky only above the truck, accentuating it’s bright red colour. You can also see large telegraph poles which look like crosses and suggest graves or death.
The landscape in this painting appears to be delicately rendered with fine detail in the grass Telegraph poles and fencing the focal Point i.e. the cars are less and have a much blockier appearance, perhaps this is due to the difference between the smooth man made objects and the natural landscape. For the most part, this painting has also been built up in layers and it looks Like starting From dark to light. The grass towards the centre right hand side of the painting has a luminous quality to it, showing the brightness from the sky. However the Sky this seems to have some marks made from long broad strokes and others from scraping paint away. This give a tumultuous look to the sky and adds character.
Overall this exhibition gave me a real feeling of both the political landscape and the overriding emotions that will have been felt throughout 1930s America. Of course there were many more pieces that both impressed and spoke to me, but the ones reviewed are those which appeal to me the most. They all have very different things to say and different viewpoints with which the artist will have painted from and I think that all these art works in one place sends a different message to that which you would receive if each of these were viewed individually. I came away from the exhibition with a phrase in mind “KEEP CALM AND CARRY ON” a famous expression throughout Britain during World War II. The strong expressions from the Grant Wood paintings, industrialisation of America in the Charles Sheeler works, the singular figure carrying on with their work in the paintings of Edward Hopper and to a degree, the emerging black community in William H Johnson’s Street Life Harlem.
Demonstration of technical and visual skills – materials, techniques, observational skills, visual awareness, design and compositional skills.
I think that at this level I have demonstrated the beginnings of a strong foundation for both technical and visual skills. This has been shown throughout via my varied use of media and techniques to create the desired outcome for each of the exercises. I have shown a knowledge of light and how that relates to tone and mass and shown a visual awareness by translating this into my work. My compositional sketches started a little weaker and at the early stages I wasn’t too sure what was expected of me, however during assignment 1, I have honed this process and at present I am happy with the way I am organising my compositions and evolving my ideas. Of course there is still room for improvement but at this stage of the course I am happy with my progress.
Quality of outcome – content, application of knowledge, presentation of work in a coherent manner, discernment, conceptualisation of thoughts, communication of ideas.
I think I’ve been careful to apply my new found knowledge to my work. I have set my initial sketches out in a clear and concise, organised way which makes it easier for me to look back and make any necessary adjustments or decisions to move forward. I think I have been objective when reviewing my work and made suggestions on how to change things I’m not happy with and also to keep things that I like. My online log is well laid out an easy to navigate depending on what a person may decide they want to look at. Although at the early stages of the course, I have already developed a process from start to finish that enables me to move smoothly throughout the exercise or assignment. This process may of course need to evolve in some way and only time will tell, I’m sure that some changes will need to be made but I think I have a good starting point to work from. My written and communication skills have always been reasonably good and I feel that I have communicated my ideas and the evolution of these in a concise manner.
Demonstration of creativity – imagination, experimentation, invention, development of a personal voice
This has always been the most difficult part for me. Many people are extremely imaginative and can easily put an image in their mind to paper, I unfortunately have the inverse. I can copy what’s put in front of me and I can observe reasonably accurately (of course these are still skills that need to be improved upon and developed), in my own mind at least. This of course inhibits not only the imagination but also the personal voice side of this course which I think can take a bit of finding, especially in the early stages. I am currently writing up on a study visit to the “America After the Fall” exhibition and an artist by the name of William H Johnson seemed to take until he was almost 40 to find his. Therefore, I am not overly worried and actually I have good ideas that I think at times can be inventive and outside of the box, my assignment piece for example I think was a clever way of arranging, quite a personal still life and is probably a little different. Without the subject in front of me however, I would struggle to create a realistic representation, I’m sure this is a skill that can be improved upon, the same as any other. I am reasonably experimental and I think that throughout the first part of this course, this can be seen. I have experimented with a large range of different media, I have tried using different marks, creating different textures and to an extent, different supports. I have also experimented within each medium, using them in different ways and there is, at least in part, a culmination of this in my final piece.
Contexts reflection – research, critical thinking (learning blogs at on and, at second and third level, critical reviews and essays)
I have tried to find a selection of respectable sources for each piece of research i.e. websites ending with .edu .ac or .gov although this can sometimes prove difficult to find, however I on occasion will use a different source i.e. .net .org etc. if I can find the same fact said on more than one website. Whilst I have tried to read a fair amount before commenting, I have tried to leave the history of each artist to a brief paragraph, editing so only the most important or influential parts of the artist’s life are listed, these are important to know as they will certainly have an impact on the art but as many of these facts are easily accessible, I try not to linger on them in my blog. I have heard it mentioned a couple of times that what is most important in my review, is how I feel about a certain piece or artist and why. What I find fascinating when I look at a specific piece is the techniques that have been used to create these extraordinary effects, I find this most important and in my blog, you will often see me trying to dissect a specific work. I also like to try and think not only about the how but about the why, what the artist was trying to achieve? What is the message? And of course, is there even a message to look for? Again these thoughts are present. This way of critical thinking, I can then bring to my own art.
Overall I am quite happy with how the first part of this course turned out and until I hear from my tutor with some feedback (which I will post on here in full), I plan to continue doing what I have been. Once feedback is received of course, things may need to be slightly (I hope) adjusted.
And so as a new adventure begins. I have started by asking myself; What do I wish to gain from this course? How will I approach exercises and research points? What kind of artist am I? What kind of artist do I wish to become? Of course most of these answers are difficult to put into words given that they are more emotional ideals rather than logical conclusions. Clearly my end goal would be a BA (Hons) in painting but I want more than just a piece of paper declaring proficiency in a subject. I want to emerge myself into one of the oldest and most revered traditions throughout history. What intrinsic value does a true piece of art actually hold? Other than a few exceptions, the frame is worth more than the canvas, this however is not the true value of art. When a person is prepared to pay an exuberant amount of money for a piece, what are they actually buying? I would suggest that they’re not paying for a painting but for how that painting makes them feel. This shows us just how strong the pull of art can be and this is a large part of what fascinates me. I also find drawing/painting extremely therapeutic which given the amount of concentration and thought involved is paradoxical. I tend to be representational when I paint and whilst I often find the more abstract art to be pleasing on the eye, I confess to not truly understanding it. I recently began to read The Practice and Science of Drawing by Harold Speed and in the preface there was a short paragraph that resonated with me
“If anybody looks at a picture by Claude Monet from the point of view of a Raphael, he will see nothing but a meaningless jargon of wild paint-strokes. And if anybody looks at a Raphael from the point of view of a Claude Monet, he will, no doubt, only see hard, tinny figures in a setting devoid of any of the lovely atmosphere that always envelops form seen in nature.” (Speed, 1913)
This indicates to me that whilst art is subjective and an individual may have certain preferences, it is important to understand and experience other forms of art, after all no one would argue against both Monet and Raphael being masters of their craft. It is with this in mind that I shall endeavour to keep an open mind during my research and whilst on occasion I may not personally like what happens to be in front of me, I will try to understand and at the very least admire and respect it.
I will be setting myself deadlines and try to do a little each evening and more on the weekends both practical and theoretical, slowly progressing through the course. I hope to complete each unit in around a year or so to finish within the 12 year time limit. Of course it is very early stages at the moment so these are very loosely defined right now.
My next steps will be to finish reading through the study guides have another look through the course and complete “An Introduction to Studying at HE”. Once I have done this and had a chat with my tutor I will be reporting back after completing the first exercise.
Speed, Harold (1913) – The Practice and Science of Drawing, Dover publications inc.